X Close

Online Exclusive

A Humble Submission

Monday, 12 June 2017 | MYT 10:18 AM

Do not prosecute those who hurt feelings

A TV presenter was recently charged in the Sibu magistrate’s court with allegedly insulting the father of former national sprinter Watson Nyambek during a TV programme.

Azizul Ammar Abu Hassan was charged together with the producer of the TV programme Sukan Tak Sentral under Section 504 of the Penal Code.

The controversy occurred during a segment in April when Azizul Ammar purportedly insulted Watson's father by imitating the bleating of a goat when mentioning Watson's full name.

Although Watson himself did not watch the segment, he was told about the incident by his wife.  He then lodged a police report against the presenter, the network that aired the programme and the studio that produced the show.

He told the press that he and his family were humiliated by what happened and wanted stern action to be taken against the responsible parties.

Watson also expressed a desire to bring a civil suit against those responsible. To date however, it does not appear that he has filed any suit in this regard.

At the same time, the network, studio and the TV presenter have all apologised for the segment. However, Watson is reportedly adamant in proceeding with legal action.

There is little doubt that the segment was insulting and simply not funny.

Of course, the relevant parties must be more careful and discerning when preparing scripts and programmes to be aired.

Watson's anger is understandable. No one should question why Watson is so angry with the segment. To him, it was offensive. His feelings have been hurt.

Each person has his or her own threshold for anger and acceptance. Clearly for Watson, the segment crossed a line and he could not accept the apologies issued by those involved. That is his right. We cannot force him to accept the apology.

Yet, the presenter and producer have now been charged with a criminal offence.

Section 504 provides for the offence of "intentional insult with intent to provoke a breach of the peace". It is an offence, therefore, for a person to intentionally insult, and thereby gives provocation to any person, intending or knowing it to be likely that such provocation will cause the other person to break the public peace, or to commit any other offence.

If convicted, the accused can be punished with imprisonment for a term of up to two years or with fine, or both.

The offence is not a minor one.

Whether Azizul Ammar and producer Abdul Ghani Mohd Mokhtar are guilty or not of the charge is something which must be proven in court when the time comes.

We should, however, ask whether there is a need for the two of them to be charged, essentially for hurting the feelings of another person.

The segment may have been offensive, but it still does not justify the intervention of the Public Prosecutor in proffering the charge.

The segment did not threaten public order or national security. It has not threatened persons or property.

Yes, it was rude and should rightly be condemned and criticised. But it is not the State’s business to ensure that feelings of individuals are not hurt. Being rude, insensitive, offensive or insulting, on their own, should not attract State intervention.

As such, there is no need for the Prosecution to charge Azizul Ammar and Abdul Ghani.

Let the matter be resolved by Watson and those involved themselves, instead of by way criminal prosecution.

> The views expressed are entirely the writer's own.

More Articles

Filter by

Do not prosecute those who hurt feelings

12 June 2017

Rude and offensive comments may hurt one's feelings, but they should not attract State intervention.

Respecting the caretaker government convention

29 May 2017

MANY predict that sometime next year, Parliament will be dissolved to make way for the 14th General Election. When this happens, the state legislative assemblies will also be dissolved, except for Sarawak which held its elections last year.

Early start: In this file photo, a young voter is exercising her right to participate in the political process of the country.

Time to allow voting at 18

18 May 2017

Malaysians can drive, marry, sign contracts and be tried in court as an adult by that age, so they should be able to cast their ballots, too.

Draconian laws and the legislative process

1 May 2017

Democracy is not a political system in which the majority may do as it pleases.

There is place for satire in society

18 April 2017

The argument that any artistic or literary work must not cause offence or hurt the feelings of others misses the whole point of satire. Satirical works that do not offend are not satire.

The Constitution stands supreme

6 April 2017

The special position of Islam as the religion of the State is clear, but laws do not have to be passed in conformity with Islamic law to be valid.

Allow discussions on RU355 amendment

20 March 2017

No citizen should ever be excluded or prevented from taking a stand about a piece of legislation, writes Syahredzan Johan

Time to enact the Freedom of Information Act

3 March 2017

ON Jan 17 of this year, the United States Central Intelligence Agency released about 12 million pages of declassified documents from its archive.

Jakarta's governor Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (left), better known as "Ahok", with his wife Veronica (right) and son Nicholas show off their ink-stained fingers after casting their votes in Jakarta on February 15, 2017. - AFP

Lessons from the Jakarta elections

20 February 2017

The Jakarta gubernatorial elections, with its two-round system, may be more costly than the conventional first-past-the-post voting system, but it ensures that wining candidates are elected by the majority of voters.

Why oppose the US travel ban?

6 February 2017

It is important to oppose Donald Trump's travel ban because it concerns the United States - a beacon of liberal democracy.

  • Page 1 of 2

Go to page:


Recent Posts