News

  • Nation
  • World Updates
  • Courts
  • Parliament
  • Columnists
  • Opinion

Thursday, September 02, 2004

Anwar Ibrahim's appeal allowed and he is freed

News Update by RAPHAEL WONG of The Star

PUTRAJAYA: Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was wheeled out the Palace of Justice a free man after the Federal Court acquitted him of sodomising his former family driver.

The three-person Federal Court bench reached a 2-1 majority decision when they allowed the former deputy prime minister’s appeal and overturned the conviction and nine-year jail term yesterday — exactly six years after his sacking as deputy prime minister.

The panel headed by Federal Court judge Justice Abdul Hamid Mohamad also allowed the appeal of his adopted brother Sukma Darmawan Sasmitaat Madja who was jailed six years for the same offence.

Court of Appeal judge Tengku Baharuddin Shah Tengku Mahmud concurred with Justice Abdul Hamid while Federal Court judge Justice Rahmah Hussin dissented.

Justice Abdul Hamid Mohamad said that the prosecution had failed to successfully prove an essential part of the alleged offences as stated in the charges beyond a reasonable doubt on evidence and in accordance with the established principles of law.

“In this case Azizan’s evidence on the date of the incident is doubtful as he had given three different dates in three different years, the first two covering a period of one month each and the last covering a period of three months.

“He being the only source for the date, his inconsistency, contradiction and demeanour when giving evidence on the issue does not make him a reliable source. As such, an essential part of the offence has not been proved by the prosecution,” he said.

Justice Abdul Hamid said since the

offence was a sexual one, it was also unsafe to convict on the evidence of Azizan alone.

“Since the applicable law in this case requires that the prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt before the defence may be called, the same burden is required to convict the appellants at the end of the case for the defence.

“We are of the view that the High Court has misdirected itself in calling for the appellants to enter their defence.

“They should have been acquitted at the end of the case for the prosecution,” he said as he ended his judgment at 11am.

Justice Rahmah, who then read out her judgment, said the appellate court would not normally interfere with any sentence passed by a lower court unless it was satisfied that the punishment was manifestly inadequate or excessive or illegal having regard to all the facts disclosed.

“I am not convinced that there is any ground for me to say that the courts below erred, so as to warrant this Court to interfere.

“I agree with the learned trial Judge that the offences committed by the appellants were serious and demanded appropriate punishment so as to reflect public abhorrence to such crimes,” she said when dismissing the appeals against the convictions and sentences of Anwar and Sukma.

Justice Abdul Hamid said that by majority, the appeal was allowed with the sentence and conviction of both men set aside.

“We know people will comment for and against our judgments so we would like to make one request — before making any comments, we hope they will read the judgments first on the website,” he said.

Anwar, who was wheeled into the courtroom at 9am dressed in white shirt and navy blue pants, was seen smiling as the verdict was read out.

As Justice Rahmah was reading out her judgment, Anwar’s daughters were seen going behind their father and as they did that, he stretched out his arm and placing it around their shoulders.

After the judges left the court, Anwar’s wife, Datin Seri Wan Azizah Wan Ibrahim, who was in tears, entered the dock with their two daughters.

There were also shouts of “Reformasi” by several members of the public.

Anwar, 57, and Sukma, 43, were found guilty by the Kuala Lumpur High Court on Aug 8, 2000 on the charge of sodomising Anwar’s former family driver, Azizan Abu Bakar, at Sukma’s apartment in Tivoli Villa, Bangsar, between January and March 1993.

Anwar was sentenced to nine years’ jail while Sukma received six years and ordered to be given four strokes of the rotan. Sukma was also convicted by the High Court on a charge of abetting Anwar in the commission of the offence.

The Court of Appeal, on April 18 last year, dismissed their appeals.

Anwar was first convicted for corruption on April 14, 1999 and was jailed for six years.

He should have been released on April 14, 2003 after a one-third remission but had to start serving his sentence for the sodomy offence, which the court ordered to be served consecutively.

His bail application was denied and he had to be in jail pending yesterday’s decision.

Anwar was sacked as Deputy Prime Minister exactly six years ago —Sept 2, 1998.

Check our special epaper edition

  • E-mail this story
  • Print this story

News Poll