US top court declines to hear Google appeal in Oracle Java fight


  • TECH
  • Tuesday, 30 Jun 2015

HARDER TO INNOVATE?: Google said an Oracle victory would deter innovation as software developers would not be able to build freely on each others' work.

Oracle Corp won a major legal victory in a closely watched copyright case involving the company's Java programming language as the US Supreme Court declined to hear Google Inc's appeal.

The decision upholds a ruling that allows Oracle to seek licensing fees for the use of some of the Java language. Google had said it should be able to use Java without paying a fee.

The case involves how much copyright protection should extend to Java. Google, which used Java to design its Android smartphone operating system, said in court papers that an Oracle victory would obstruct "an enormous amount of innovation" because software developers would not be able to build freely on each others' work.

The litigation now returns to a San Francisco federal court for more proceedings on Google's separate "fair use" defence.

"We will continue to defend the interoperability that has fostered innovation and competition in the software industry," Google said in a statement.

Oracle, however, has said effective copyright protection is the key to software development. General Counsel Dorian Daley said that the Supreme Court decision was a "win for innovation."

Google's Android operating system is the world's best-selling smartphone platform. Oracle sued Google in 2010 and is seeking roughly US$1bil (RM3.77bil) on its copyright claims.

The case examined whether application programming interfaces, which connect programs, can be copyrighted.

A San Francisco federal judge decided that the Java APIs replicated by Google were not subject to copyright protection and were free for all to use. But the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed that last year, saying it was bound to respect copyright protection for software "until either the Supreme Court or Congress tells us otherwise."

The Obama administration, which was asked to weigh in on the issue earlier this year, asked the Supreme Court not to take the case. The administration said the dispute had raised important concerns about the effect that enforcement of Oracle's copyright could have on software development, but said those issues could be addressed via Google's fair use defence.

The case is Google v. Oracle, US Supreme Court, No. 14-410. — Reuters

Limited time offer:
Just RM5 per month.

Monthly Plan

RM13.90/month
RM5/month

Billed as RM5/month for the 1st 6 months then RM13.90 thereafters.

Annual Plan

RM12.33/month

Billed as RM148.00/year

1 month

Free Trial

For new subscribers only


Cancel anytime. No ads. Auto-renewal. Unlimited access to the web and app. Personalised features. Members rewards.
Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
   

Next In Tech News

Japan to levy big fines with new app rules
Inside Big Tech’s underground race to buy AI training data
Facebook scams demand stricter online rules, Japan lawmaker says
A Chinese firm is America’s favourite drone maker – except in Washington
Alphabet, Microsoft shares jump as investors cheer AI investment
Snap shares jump nearly 30% after Q1 beat
Rescue pup to meme star: The real-life ‘Dogecoin’ dog
Elon Musk is once again richer than Mark Zuckerberg as fortunes reverse
GPS bracelet places 18-year-old at the scene of 11 different break-ins, US cops say
Cat hides in Amazon return package – then ends up in California 700 miles from home

Others Also Read