Home > Opinion > Columnists
Tuesday July 21, 2015 MYT 12:00:00 AM
Tuesday July 21, 2015 MYT 7:33:58 AM
by wan saiful wan jan
Penang Gerakan Harapan Baru protem chairman Datuk Dr Mujahid Yusof Rawa and his Committee members. - Filepic
THIS Raya week marks the beginning of a more concerted effort by some figures in the Islamic Party of Malaysia (PAS) to set up a new political party. Calling themselves “Gerakan Harapan Baru” (GHB), they have started a nationwide tour to speak to the public in all states across Malaysia.
Turnout at the event in Kelantan and Perlis on Sunday was good and people whom I spoke to who attended the events were excited.
PAS’ response to GHB is expected. They see it as a threat and they are painting GHB in a bad light. This is sheer hypocrisy.
Various individuals in PAS, including their President Datuk Seri Hadi Awang, have gone overboard to insult their former colleagues who lost in the party election in June.
Some others claimed that the outcome of the party election is a sign that God is helping PAS to “cleanse” the party.
But when they realised that GHB could become a threat, PAS changed their tack and started to get upset. They are now saying that it is sinful to leave PAS to form a new party, despite earlier saying that they want them out anyway.
If GHB does end up forming a new party, the one person who will take the biggest blame will be Hadi. He will be remembered as a president who was completely impotent to prevent the break-up.
History will also record Hadi as one of the main causes of the break-up. When party members were insulting each other, he did not urge restraint but he joined them. I have never seen a party president who just does not care about the fate of his own party like Hadi.
Having said that, I must also put it on record that Hadi remains one of the Islamic scholars whom I respect. Unfortunately, when it comes to political acumen, I regret that he will be remembered for this political failure.
The GHB movement has committed to forming a new party. This will come with many hurdles and it will not be easy.
Registering a new party is a challenge by itself. Then there is the problem of grassroots machinery. The party will have to work hard to create their own campaign teams on the ground and this, too, is no easy task.
When I heard the results of the June party election, I was hoping that those who lost would remain in the party. I would have preferred if they allowed the conservatives full and free reign for two years.
That way, everyone would eventually realise that the conservatives are nothing but empty heads who have no real ideas to offer the country. And during the two years, I was hoping that the progressives would turn themselves into an organised force to win back important posts in the next party election, just before the 14th general election.
But the PAS progressives seem very certain that the party is beyond redemption. I have now realised that too.
The reality is, PAS has always been a conservative party and they have only allowed the progressives to hold certain positions temporarily, without the party changing its nature.
The progressives have miserably failed to change the party when they had the chance. Ultimately, the progressives charted their own demise in PAS when they mistakenly refused to educate party members about what progressiveness means. They even refused to acknowledge the need to do it when they had the chance.
The formation of a new political party could signify a major shift in Malaysian politics. But looking at the messages coming out from the GHB leaders, I worry about another mistake that they are now making.
They are positioning themselves as a competitor to PAS. One of the GHB leaders, Khalid Samad, said that the only difference between them and PAS is their commitment to working with other partners and their commitment to the Pakatan Rakyat concept. He also said that in terms of belief and understanding towards Islam, they are the same.
This “PAS-but-different” strategy means that they are pitting themselves not against their bigger political enemies, but against PAS. Of course, PAS will go ape because this also means GHB will focus on stealing PAS’ members and voters. When two parties who are supposedly on the same side fight each other, the only beneficiary is the party on the other side.
I do understand that the GHB leaders are looking at the next general election and therefore they want to fill in the gap left by PAS. But this is too shortsighted.
It would have been much better if GHB were to position themselves as completely different from PAS and from all other parties in Malaysia. Their real sign of success is if they can attract not just current PAS members, but also the progressives from Umno, PKR, DAP, Gerakan, Sarawak’s PBB and all the other parties, plus those who are not yet in any party. Then only will they add real value to Malaysian politics.
Malaysians are tired of ethno-religious politics and obsession with one political overlord. Malaysians are looking for a party that fights for universal values who will champion the rights of all of us. Many are waiting to see if GHB can turn their Islamic rhetoric into universal messages acceptable to all.
This is the real challenge faced by those who want to take Malaysia into the next stage. We may believe in different things. We are a diverse country and each one of us may lean towards different directions. But we will all gather around those who can project a message of hope and unity.
If GHB positions itself as just another Islamic party rivalling PAS, then I doubt it will survive in the long term.
Wan Saiful Wan Jan is chief executive of the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (www.ideas.org.my) and a PAS member. The views expressed here are entirely the writer’s own.
> The views expressed are entirely the writer's own.
Tags / Keywords:
Wan Saiful Wan Jan, columnist
Gerakan Harapan Baru’s ‘PAS-but-different’ strategy means that they are pitting themselves not against their bigger political enemies, but against PAS.
There is a flaw in our system, inherited since before Independence, that may prevent the public from giving their complete trust.
We must separate the roles of the Attorney-General as legal advisor to the Government and Public Prosecutor who prosecutes cases in court.
If an asset declaration system was in place, accusations of personal enrichment and unjustifiably lavish lifestyles can be fended off.
Middle East countries lack competition in the electoral and political arena.
The government’s role in business, if any, is as a regulator.
We should treat everyone with equal respect, regardless of their backgrounds.
There are lessons to be learned about what happens when those who have no qualms about using force to make their point gain access to political power and government machineries.
Just because newspapers have a particular political leaning, it does not mean they should be the mouthpiece of political parties.
The word “immigrant” is gradually becoming a dirty word to us here, but in Australia a freer movement of people in and out of the country is seen as an enriching phenomenon.
Wan Saiful Wan Jan is chief executive of the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs.
Fire breaks out in Bukit Aman
Cabinet reshuffle: Who's in, who's out
China escalator swallows toddler's mother
Mukhriz pays visit to Muhyiddin
Opposition MPs to move no-confidence vote against Najib
Painful outing for child at mall
Copyright © 1995-2015 Star Media Group Berhad (ROC 10894D)(Formerly known as Star Publications (Malaysia) Berhad)