Thinking Liberally

Published: Tuesday October 14, 2014 MYT 12:00:00 AM
Updated: Tuesday October 14, 2014 MYT 7:12:03 AM

How our money is spent

Man of the hour: Najib tabling the budget 2015 in Parliament.

Man of the hour: Najib tabling the budget 2015 in Parliament.

The government presents its Budget yearly, but we must remember that the money – how funds are allocated, and how goodies are disbursed – is from the rakyat.

THE Prime Minister delivered his Budget 2015 speech last Friday. The speech started very well. I like Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak’s admission that “the biggest challenge I face in administering Malaysia … is how to balance between policies that are populist in nature as compared to those policies based on economic and financial imperatives”.

This is the reality of politics. Politicians must be and must remain popular.

Someone who does not worry about popularity shouldn’t even think about entering politics. Acknowledging that shows that Najib is a realistic politician, unlike some others who are extremely populist but always deny it.

The challenge, however, as Najib rightly pointed out, is to find the right balance between populism and doing the right thing.

In his Budget speech, Najib started by outlining some key principles that are imperative if Malaysia wants to move forward. He said we must prioritise human capital development and enhance our national competitiveness and resilience.

He also stated that we must reduce our fiscal deficit, encourage entrepreneurship, reform the taxation system, reduce leakages, and rationalise subsidies.

Almost everything that he said in the first half of his speech would make any good economist happy. But he very quickly contradicted himself when he reached the second half of the speech.

The second half focused almost completely on populist handouts and giveaways. Those who wrote the speech clearly tried very hard to include everything under the sun.

At least some money has been allocated to a very wide range of recipients, from those living in Perlis to teachers, police officers, people with debt, youths, nuclear medicine, airport runway, books, mangosteen, train services and even hill padi in Sabah.

I am disappointed with the second part of the speech. Najib missed the opportunity to educate the rakyat about austerity. He mentioned the need to make “difficult decisions”, but in the second part of the speech it was as if he had made no difficult decisions at all. It was all spend, spend, spend.

Following the speech, there was a frenzy to either support or condemn the government. But not many asked the most critical question – who is actually paying for all the allocations announced last Friday?

The common understanding seems to be that the government pays. But this is wrong.

The government is not a productive entity for it does not generate income for itself. The government does not have any money of its own.

Hence, the concept of “government money” and the idea that “the government will pay” are simply wrong.

The actual money will come from you. Every single one of you will be paying for the expenditure that was announced last Friday.

That is the nature of any government in this world. In every country, including Malaysia, the government takes money from its citizens.

To appreciate this fact, we need to understand the concept of taxation. If you read economics, taxation may take up several books to understand. But it really can be explained in plain non-technical language.

Every government will impose taxes on citizens. There are many types of taxes – income tax, corporate tax, sales tax, services tax, excise duty, import and export duties, foreign worker levy, stamp duty, Goods and Services Tax (GST), inheritance tax, assessment tax, and many more.

There are so many types of taxes that can be imposed that it is often said that there are two things no one can run away from – death and taxes. We will certainly die one day. And we always pay tax, whether we realise or not.

When it comes to taxes, you do not have a choice but to pay. Tax evaders can be punished by imprisonment. In fact, in China, until recently you could be punished by death for tax evasion. Taxes are something we are coerced to pay.

To make a very crude analogy, under normal circumstances, if a stranger coerces you to give your money to them, we usually call it theft or robbery. But when it is legitimised through an act of parliament, the coercion becomes taxation and that stranger suddenly evolves into the Inland Revenue Service.

You may not realise that you are being coerced. But ask yourself, do you pay taxes because you want to or because you have to?

Thus, if you go back to the most basic understanding of economic or taxation principles, and to use a non-technical explanation, what is commonly called “government’s money” is actually money that has been collected from every single of us through coercion.

There is nothing to celebrate when the government announces funds for certain initiatives, gives money to selected groups, or subsidises this and that.

Once again let me make a most crude analogy. Would you celebrate theft if the thief gave the money to you? I hope the answer is no.

The difference between theft and taxation is the existence of an act of parliament to legitimise the latter. Both remain coercive in nature.

Nevertheless, I don’t want readers to assume that I am calling for the abolishment of all taxes. That might be ideal, but it is also utterly unrealistic. I accept that paying taxes is a must.

What is necessary, instead, is we should acknowledge that taxes and redistribution are by nature morally questionable. Therefore, the best approach is to look at all types of government redistribution with great scepticism.

Admittedly this article raises another question, which is how do we as a country help the needy? Answering that requires at least another full article and I will come to it later.

For now, I just want to make it clear that every single allocation announced last Friday will not be paid by using the government’s money for they have none. You will pay every single sen.

> Wan Saiful Wan Jan is chief executive of the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs ( The views expressed here are entirely the writer’s own.

Tags / Keywords: Opinion, Columnists, Wan Saiful Wan Jan

More Articles

Filter by

How our money is spent

14 October 2014

The government presents its Budget yearly, but we must remember that the money – how funds are allocated, and how goodies are disbursed – is from the rakyat.

Open up the government

30 September 2014

It is really important for those in the administration to pursue a healthy relationship with groups that can be their ‘critical friends’.

Liberty and justice in practice

16 September 2014

In Scotland, both sides in the referendum campaign have put forward political, economic and cultural arguments to support their calls.

It’s time to walk the talk

2 September 2014

There seems to be a huge disconnect between what is being said by those in power and what they actually do.

Learn from the dynamics in PAS

19 August 2014

The progressives are usually the ones engaging with non-Muslims and urbanites, but the conservatives are still firmly in control of the party.

Fixed position: Khalid is staying put as Selangor Mentri Besar despite moves to oust him.

Why Selangor's Khalid must go

5 August 2014

In our Westminster system, the party nominates as MB a person whom it believes commands the greatest confidence from the state legislative assembly members. When the party loses confidence in you, then it is time for you to step down gracefully.

The new face of the Conservatives

22 July 2014

Although David Cameron may be taking his party on a dubious path, no one can deny that the British Prime Minister has shown leadership.

Creating a pasture that is equally green

8 July 2014

Instead of piecemeal offerings, we should find a more holistic and non-discriminatory way to make Malaysians want to return home.

Let more fatwa bodies flourish

24 June 2014

OUR country is becoming increasingly polarised, not least due to the actions of some state and federal religious authorities. We have seen worrying incidents lately.

More public views needed

10 June 2014

The National Unity Consultative Council should publish a White Paper to seek feedback for the new laws it is proposing to replace the Sedition Act.


Recent Posts