Home > Opinion > Columnists
Saturday November 1, 2014 MYT 12:00:00 AM
Saturday November 1, 2014 MYT 7:58:39 AM
by philip golingai
Police cordoning the road where the suspects were seen in Penampang Baru. - Filepic
Without early official reports about the incident in Penampang Baru, jittery residents
turned to conspiracy theories.
MY colleague in Kota Kinaba-lu, Muguntan Vanar said excitedly: “There is a stand-down situation in Penampang Baru. There are gunmen here and gunshots were heard. Police have cordoned the area.” His message came at 4.29pm on Thursday.
“What happened? Who are the gunmen?” I asked excitedly, regretting I was at Menara Star in Petaling Jaya and not in Penampang Baru.
“Not sure yet. I got to go. The police have asked us to move out of this place,” said Muguntan.
“Once you get the information, send the story quick for Star Online.”
Immediately, I WhatsApp-ed my “Sabah Future” group consisting of Sabahans who are concerned about their political future. “There’s a stand-down in Penampang Baru. Initial report is someone with a gun,” I wrote. I forwarded the same message to my other WhatsApp groups including my immediate family.
“Right now as currently? Where?” someone replied.
“Near Servay. Right now. Information sketchy as reporters asked to move away from scene,” I replied.
Four minutes later, a flurry of photographs of the stand-down appeared on WhatsApp – mostly scenes showing shoplots cordoned off by the bright yellow police tape.
Immediately, I tweeted the photograph with the text: “Stand-down near Servay in Penampang Baru, Sabah. Initial report says there were gunshots heard.”
Then in my WhatsApp came chilling photos of armed masked men. The initial unverified WhatsApp reports were that the masked men holding automatic rifles were robbers.
I too fell for the fake reports. I tweeted the photograph of an armed masked man and wrote: “This man is believed to be a gunman in the shootout between police and armed robbers near Servay in Penampang Baru.”
Mistake. I should have called Muguntan first. Later, he told me that the “masked robbers” were actually masked policemen.
I tweeted the same photograph and wrote: “Correction. Pix of policeman and not gunman. Two robbers shot dead in Penampang Baru in Kota Kinabalu.”
Then came the flurry of rumours and reaction to the shooting.
“Dengar ada 1 orang mati. Orang Santung di Servay Penampang (Heard one person is dead. A Shandong man in Servay Penampang).”
“Tukang masak mati di tembak (A cook shot dead).”
“Police wearing mask? Tiada bullet best pun? (Not wearing bullet proof vest) I thought they are robbers.”
“Training komando jer pula. Bikin suspen betul. (It is only a commando training. It was really suspenseful).”
I Whatsapp-ed: “It is not training. What happened is cops shot dead two robbers” and posted a photograph of a dead man slumped in an Isuzu DMax pickup truck.
Someone, whom I don’t want to name as I don’t want to embarrass my sister, Josie, wrote: “Two dead robbers acting juga kah? (The two dead robbers are also acting?)”
“They are dead,” I said.
“Jangan panik tu latihan. Skuad komander polis jah (Don’t panic, it is only training. It is only a police commando squad),” she replied.
“Don’t think it is training. The robbers are dead,” I said.
“See everybody think just wayang kulit saja by commandos. Suruh
Star reporters check kalau betul napatai??? Red paint maybe (See,
everybody thinks that it is a shadow play by commandos. Tell The Star reporters to check if the robbers are really dead. Maybe they used red paint to simulate that the robber was killed),” she wrote.
Irritated, and because I just received a photograph of the dead robber, I Whatsapp-ed the pix and wrote: “Since Josie thinks it was training, here’s pix of the dead man.”
Josie replied with three “thumbs up” emoticons.
Someone WhatsApp-ed an online article that reported: “It is understood that four masked gunmen are currently holed up in the Servay hypermarket with an unknown number of hostages.”
“The story is wrong. As no hostage situation,” I wrote.
On Whatsapp, people were speculating that Sulu gunmen had attacked Kota Kinabalu. For example, someone wrote: “Are the robbers Abu Sayyaf?” An official-looking Sulu gunmen attack alert, which looked like it came from the cops, was also circulated on WhatsApp.
It was a day filled with conspiracy theories. Many believed the 4pm shootings involved Sulu gunmen.
Sabahans are still spooked over the Tanduo intrusion where armed Sulu rebels invaded Lahad Datu last year. Many believe there will be a repeat of Tanduo.
I, however, don’t blame the public as the police silence over the shooting gave birth to many conspiracy theories. In the age of WhatsApp, the cops have to be quick in explaining what had happened. Instead, they seized journalists’ cameras and deleted the pictures.
My colleagues and I called our intelligence sources. Half of them said the shootout involved “penganas Sulu” (Sulu terrorists) while the other half insisted the dead men were robbers. I think the truth is the two men were robbers and Sulu gunmen.
At 10.43pm, my colleague Norman Ong WhatsApp-ed me: “Bernama. Police shot dead two men who are believed to be Sulu militants.”
“Police surveillance on the two men a few weeks ago had revealed they tried to recruit new members, spread the so-called Sulu Sultanate ideology in Sabah, as well as preached elements of violence,” Bernama reported, quoting a police source.
“The suspects, who came from Kota Kinabalu, were also attempting to commit an armed robbery in the area.”
The next morning, in a press conference, Sabah Police Commissioner Datuk Jalaluddin Abdul Rahman said police suspected the duo were part of a group of robbers involved in at least three robberies involving more than RM1mil.
He said police would investigate whether the two dead men were top commanders of the Royal Sulu Force. Until then, many Sabahans will remain spooked.
> The views expressed are entirely the writer’s own.
Tags / Keywords:
Without early official reports about the incident in Penampang Baru, jittery residents turned to conspiracy theories.
When kidnappers faced military might instead of receiving pay-offs, they left Sabah alone but now the lucrative business is starting up again.
The beheading threat in Jolo island could be proof that the Islamic State has gained a foothold in southern Philippines.
FireChat works even without Internet connection or cellular coverage but it has a downside.
In between grilling Asian editors, a headless chicken hunt for Vietnam’s famous beef noodle soup ensues.
Netizens and organisations are supporting the project with both prayers and cash, but the official response so far has been underwhelming.
Villagers in Kampung Dowokon decided to take the initiative to connect to the nearest town, but there’s more to be done.
Talk of Sabah pulling out was carried out underground until the threat to arrest the so-called secessionists.
There is still debate about whether North Borneo was a country, a state or a self-government in transition during the first couple of weeks of independence.
I’m proud that Sabah was one of the countries to form Malaysia, as opposed to joining Malaysia.
Copyright © 1995-2014 Star Publications (M) Bhd (Co No 10894-D)