A case of selective non-prosecution


Untouchable?: Many felt that the A-G's decision not to prosecute Ibrahim was faulty and untenable.

The case of Datuk Ibrahim Ali not being charged with sedition over his Bible-burning remarks remains a perplexing one for Malaysians seeking an answer to what they feel is an example of ‘selective non-prosecution’.

THE Attorney-General decided last week not to charge Perkasa chief Datuk Ibrahim Ali with sedition for uttering words to the effect that Malay Bibles should be burned.

Play, subscribe and stand a chance to win prizes worth over RM39,000! T&C applies.

Monthly Plan

RM 13.90/month

RM 11.12/month

Billed as RM 11.12 for the 1st month, RM 13.90 thereafter.

Best Value

Annual Plan

RM 12.33/month

RM 9.87/month

Billed as RM 118.40 for the 1st year, RM 148 thereafter.

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
Politics , Ibrahim Ali

Next In Nation

Outcry over Kasigui’s fate
Retiree begins run for kids’ cancer cause
On call 24/7 on RM92mil budget
Illegal dump sites cleared out
206 schools in Kedah to conduct PdPR for three days
Passion fuels a fulfilling career in manga
From law to ‘Lord Barnaby’
Hunt on for individuals who set off fireworks from car
Middle East conflict a wake-up call for MSMEs to diversify
Johor’s clean sweep against litterbugs

Others Also Read