Home > News > Environment
Monday March 10, 2014 MYT 12:00:00 AM
Monday March 10, 2014 MYT 8:29:27 AM
by cammy clark
Life in captivity: Lolita has lived more than 40 years at Miami Seaquarium. Activists want her to be returned to the wild but others fear that she might not be able to survive on her own. — MCT
Activists try again to liberate the 3,000kg killer whale.
A WETSUIT-clad trainer stands on a platform in the middle of a pool and announces to the audience of tourists and schoolchildren: “And now, it’s time to meet the biggest star in Miami.”
Seconds later, the 6m, 3,000kg killer whale named Lolita soars into the air and lands with a gigantic splash, spraying cold water over the sides and onto the squealing kids draped in plastic. Lolita never fails to delight. For nearly 44 years, the wild-born orca has been the main draw for Miami Seaquarium, the marine park on Virginia Key where millions have come from around the world to see the majestic creature perform tricks for fish.
“To us, Lolita is part of our family,” longtime park curator Robert Rose said.
But activists say it is long overdue for the killer whale to be returned to her real family in the Pacific Ocean. Most of the current activists have been part of previous efforts over the past two decades to “Liberate Lolita”. All have fizzled. Now, the activists are waging a seemingly last-ditch campaign, with legal battles on two fronts.
In one case, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Foundation (PETA) submitted a petition last year to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to include Lolita on the endangered species list as a member of the southern resident killer whales. That population is made up of the J, K and L pods that roam coastal sites from central California north to south-east Alaska and spend spring and summers in the inland waterways of Washington state and British Columbia. Lolita, a member of the L pod, is the only captive orca of that southern resident population, which is down to about 85 members.
PETA filed the petition on behalf of the Animal Legal Defense Fund, Orca Network and four individuals. That same group also launched a lawsuit in 2012 against the US Department of Agriculture that “challenges its absurd decision to renew the Seaquarium’s federal Animal Welfare Act licence.” Jared Goodman, director of animal law for PETA, said the Seaquarium is not in compliance with federal law because Lolita’s tank is too small, she does not have the company of another orca and she is not protected from the burning sun.
Trapped from the wild
The story of Lolita begins in 1970, when wranglers using explosives herded about 60 to 80 of the killer whales into a 1.2ha net pen in Penn Cove, about 80km north of Seattle. She was one of seven selected for a life of captivity. Marine-mammal vet Dr Jesse White bought Lolita, who was then about four to six years old and weighed only 900kg for a reported US$20,000. She originally was called Tokitae and soon was transported to Miami’s marine mammal park, where Flipper was filmed. She would share a pool with a male orca, Hugo. Sometimes they would mate during shows. But in 1980, Hugo died of a brain aneurysm.
In the 1990s, along came the Free Willy craze. The 1993 film about a boy freeing a captive orca led to campaign to free the real-life Keiko, who was an attraction at an amusement park in Mexico City. Keiko was moved to a bigger pool in Oregon for a boot camp to learn how to be wild again and then taken to a sea pen off Iceland, where he originally was captured in 1979. Eventually he was set free in the North Atlantic.
That craze led to a “Free Lolita” campaign in 1995. The campaign offered US$2mil to Seaquarium owner Arthur Hertz for Lolita, as well as rights to a documentary film to be made about her. Hertz said Lolita was not for sale. In 2002, Hertz tried to acquire an orca companion for Lolita. It was Keiko. Hertz sent a letter to Norway’s Ambassador saying the Seaquarium would like to acquire Keiko, who at the time was approaching people and boats in Norway begging for fish. The ambassador responded no, saying: “It would be a great step back to put him in an aquarium again.”
Because Lolita was caught before the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, no federal permit is needed to move her – then or now. But a federal permit is needed to release her back into the wild. Howard Garrett, founder of the Washington-based Orca Network, has been fighting for Lolita’s freedom for decades and says the fight is not over. He touted the news that recently NMFS reversed itself and recommended that Lolita be included in the endangered species list of the southern resident killer whale population. NMFS is accepting public comment about the proposal until March at http://regulations.gov.
More harm if released
While it’s likely after the public comment period and follow-up analysis that Lolita will be added to the endangered species list, that move would add one more layer of protection for the captive facilities. “Under the Endangered Species Act, we think release into the wild could be harmful to the mammal and to the wild population,” said Lynne Barre, NFMS’ branch chief for protected resources. Rector said NMFS has not issued permits to allow captive mammals back into the wild since a pilot programme for dolphins at a sanctuary in the Keys failed miserably in the 1990s, with activists battling each other.
W. Ron DeHaven, US Department of Agriculture (USDA) deputy administrator of animal care, wrote in a 1999 letter that reiterated the federal agency’s longtime position that Lolita’s “whale bowl,” although the smallest pool in North America for a killer whale at 24m by 18m and 6m deep, is legal.
He also wrote that the six Pacific white-sided dolphins that share the pool with Lolita qualify as “companion animals” required for mammals that are considered social. He made no mention of shade. Now it’s in the hands of the federal court in Miami to decide if there is any merit to the activists’ claims that the USDA is improperly renewing the Seaquarium’s annual permits to keep Lolita.
Garrett said the Orca Network and Ken Balcomb, a longtime orca researcher with the Centre for Whale Research, have devised an elaborate plan to retire Lolita to a transitional coastal sanctuary sea pen in Kanaka Bay, a cove on San Juan Island in Washington state. There would be a rehabilitation period during which humans would work to teach her skills needed to survive in the wild, including how to catch and eat live fish. The goal would be to eventually reintroduce Lolita to her natural family. The millions it would take would come from private donors, Garrett said.
Waste of funds?
Rose, Seaquarium curator for 19 years, calls the plan absurd and said the best place for Lolita to spend the remaining years of her life is right where she is now, receiving first-class medical care, nutritious restaurant-quality food and the constant care of the staff.
“I don’t understand all this misguided energy and effort and money for a specific animal,” he said. “Why not invest it in the killer whale population out there that is endangered? Why not really look for answers to over-fishing of their food source, or the toxins created in the environments that we as humans are doing, or boat traffic?”
Billy Hurley, past president and current board member of the Alliance of Marine Mammal Parks & Aquariums, agreed: “Extremists are spending enormous amounts of money for something that is not a problem and during that time we’re watching wild populations fall apart.”
Clive D.L. Wynne, a professor who specialises in animal behaviour at Arizona State University, said he’s sympathetic to Lolita’s plight but says she probably should not be returned to the wild at this stage.
“Certainly, those animals deserve a better existence than living in a small basin and performing every day,” he said. “But Keiko is a prime example of the prognosis for a whale being returned to the wild after living decades in captivity. Living in the wild is difficult. And the odds to master those skills later in life leave little ground for optimism.”
Rose points out that more than US$15mil was spent to free Keiko, and it resulted in the whale “dying alone in a fjord in Norway of pneumonia. It was not the fairytale story that she jumped over the wall and everybody lived happily ever after.”
It likely is too late for Lolita. But the tide of public opinion has been changing, with more people finding it wrong that highly intelligent mammals are held captive at marine parks and aquariums for the enjoyment of humans.
“If people want to see the orcas in person, they should come to Puget Sound and go out on a nice whale-watching boat to see them in their habitat,” Ellick said.
As for Lolita, who ended another performance by flopping onto the platform in the middle of the pool and waving her flipper to the cheering crowd, she was eager for her reward of fish. Rose said Lolita has been a great ambassador for wild killer whales, by educating all the people who come to see her, and it’s a role that she should continue to fill. – The Miami Herald/McClatchy Tribune Information Services
Tags / Keywords:
Environment, Environment, ecowatch
A Copenhagen neighbourhood adapts to climate change
Copenhagen to be the world’s first carbon-neutral capital
Glyphosate is a “probably carcinogenic” pesticide. Why do cities still use it?
Yellow card for Thai fisheries
Keep Johor clean to ensure tourists return
Unfriended director: ‘I hope after you see the movie, you think a little bit more about what’s on your home computer.’
Go nuts and put peanut butter in everything!
From a waiter at Lafite to a service industry professional
Next stop – Sensational Singapore
How Malaysians abroad are bridging a skills gap
10 ways to discover Cairns and the Great Barrier Reef
Social ills worry residents
Surreal art in Dubai
Cars that are already Apple Watch-ready
Copyright © 1995-2015 Star Publications (M) Bhd (Co No 10894-D)