Home > Lifestyle > Features
Wednesday June 18, 2014 MYT 4:55:00 PM
Wednesday June 18, 2014 MYT 7:15:51 AM
by will dunham
The hot question of whether dinosaurs were warm-blooded or cold-blooded finally has a good answer.
And as it turns out, dinosaurs — Earth’s dominant land animals until an asteroid wiped them out by 65 million years ago — were somewhere in between. Scientists said they came to that conclusion after evaluating the metabolism of numerous dinosaurs using a formula based on their body mass as revealed by the bulk of their thigh-bones and their growth rates as shown by growth rings in fossil bones akin to those in trees.
The study, published in the journal Science on June 12, assessed 21 species of dinosaurs including super predators Tyrannosaurus and Allosaurus, long-necked Apatosaurus, duck-billed Tenontosaurus and bird-like Troodon, as well as a range of mammals, birds, bony fish, sharks, lizards, snakes and crocodiles.
“Our results showed that dinosaurs had growth and metabolic rates that were actually not characteristic of warm-blooded or even cold-blooded organisms. They did not act like mammals or birds nor did they act like reptiles or fish,” said University of Arizona evolutionary biologist and ecologist Brian Enquist. “Instead, they had growth rates and metabolisms intermediate to warm-blooded and cold-blooded organisms of today. In short, they had physiologies that are not common in today’s world."
There has been a long-standing debate about whether dinosaurs were slow, lumbering cold-blooded animals — as scientists first proposed in the 19th century — or had a uniquely advanced, more warm-blooded physiology. But as scientists unearthed remains of more fast-looking dinosaurs like Velociraptor, some championed the idea that dinosaurs were as active and warm–blooded as mammals and birds. The realisation that birds arose from small-feathered dinosaurs seemed to support that view.
University of New Mexico biologist John Grady said the idea that creatures must be either warm-blooded or cold-blooded is too simplistic when looking over the vast expanse of time. Like dinosaurs, some animals alive today — like the great white shark, leatherback sea turtle, and tuna — do not fit easily into either category, Grady added.
“A better answer would be ‘in the middle.’ By examining animal growth and rates of energy use, we were able to reconstruct a metabolic continuum, and place dinosaurs along that continuum. Somewhat surprisingly, dinosaurs fell right in the middle,” Grady said.
The researchers called creatures with this medium-powered metabolism ‘mesotherms’. They are contrasted by ‘ectotherms’, cold-blooded animals with low metabolic rates that do not produce much heat and bask in the sun to warm up, and 'endotherms', warm-blooded animals that use heat from metabolic reactions to maintain a high, stable body temperature.
Grady said an intermediate metabolism may have allowed dinosaurs to get much bigger than any mammal ever could. Warm-blooded animals need to eat a lot so they are frequently hunting or munching on plants. “It is doubtful that a lion the size of T. rex could eat enough to survive,” Grady said. – Reuters
Tags / Keywords:
Lifestyle, Features, Science, Paleontology, Biology, Dinosaur, warm-blooded, cold-blooded
E.coli: From belly bacteria to engine fuel
The Smartphone Generation: 6 billion users by 2020
California blue whales bounce back from extinction
Lagunita and Tamchen: Lost Mayan cities back on the map!
The Spinosaurus was a beast of both worlds
From Istana Budaya, with love: A James Bond celebration
New York is the vegan capital of the world
Man Vs tiny eating machine video goes viral
Help! Van Gogh's 'Sunflowers' is losing its swag!
Uncaging the tiger
Once upon a gene: Untangling the origins of Europeans
A celebration of all things pizza – in its spiritual home
Ebola lockdown brings Sierra Leone capital to a halt
EU regulators agree on guidelines for "right to be forgotten" complaints
Copyright © 1995-2014 Star Publications (M) Bhd (Co No 10894-D)